Java EE, Thin WARs, Microservices and Continuous Delivery at Otto

Bastian, please introduce yourself (feel free to share your twitter, linkedin, github etc. accounts)

My name is Bastian Sperrhacke and I am a software developer and technical lead in a ten people team called "Verfügbarkeit" (availability) at Otto GmbH & Co. KG. There are three business analysts, six developers (including me) and one teamlead responsible for the product availability calculation and the product sell services. We are one of many teams in the backend IT of Otto. You can find me at @deratzmann and Bastian Sperrhacke.

What are you building with Java EE?

We build our latest system for additional sell services for products offered in a shop with Java EE 7. For example, if you want to add an additional warranty to your mobile phone or want to get rid of your old washing machine while receiving the new one, there is a business case called "article service" which abstracts these kind of cases. We build this system as a Java EE microservice and offer REST Services for our frontends and shops.

Can you share with us some geeky numbers like e.g. TX per seconds, heap sizes, thinnest WARs etc -- whatever Java EE devs might find interesting.

Currently our WAR file is about 300kb, the biggest file inside is our swagger documentation file (71kb). From commit to production we are live in about 7 minutes with our continuous delivery pipeline, including Unit-, Integration-, System- and Performancetests. Our software is running since begin of February 2018 and had 5280823 requests in the last week.

Are you happy with Java EE so far? Is Java EE productive?

Yes, I am very happy with Java EE. It provides me a standardized way to code, is well documented and highly used. With Java EE you can become productive in minutes, no bloated configuration or dependency hell anywhere. Just code your business requirements.

Which application servers, tools or IDEs are you using?

First of all we use the Payara full server, it is very fast and productive, well documented. It provides the stable Java EE API and the innovative, fast moving microprofile. The Payara team is very nice, I got to know them at JavaOne last year. Relating IDEs it is up to each team member to use his favorite IDE or editor. Most of us (including me) are using netbeans, very nice, fast and lean IDE. For our pipeline we use Jenkins. Our docker containers are orchestrated by docker swarm.

You are using the Boundary Control Entity pattern to structure your applications. What were your experiences, challenges and findings so far?

The first big challenge was to structure the class and the packages in a business, not a technical driven way. So no more "persistence", "valueobjects" or "service" package. For decades developers learned to structure in a technical way. But for new guys in a team it is hard, to find a business case implementation in such a structure. The ECB pattern is the easiest way to fit in that context. You start with an entity and a service called boundary. There is no easier way. And if (and only if) the boundary "gets too big", you refactor the non-standalone functions out to a so called control. In my opinion this way leads to a clearly arranged code, not overengineered, just fitted to the current required business case.

How important are standards for you? Does your application depend on application server specific APIs?

Standards are very important for me. When you are professionally developing products, you have to ask yourself: Do I technically need an early adopter software or a long lasting lean product. In real world projects the truth lies between these two approaches. And Java EE is a perfect fit for that. First you get a quite stable API, which is continuously evolving. Since Java EE was transferred from Oracle to the community, I think there will be much more drive behind it. Let's have a look at the great companies standing behind the microprofile initiative. This initiative is also responsible for a quite innovative de facto standardization. Using one of the application servers like Payara means, I get the API stability of Java EE and a fast evolving feature set of the microprofile. In our project we currently use the microprofile-config-api and plan to use the new fault-tolerance-api. Furthermore we use some Payara specific implementations like the Jackson API. We also planned to use the build-in Hazelcast for distributed job scheduling and caching.

Which Java EE APIs are you using in your products?

Generally we use EJB, JPA, CDI, Bean Validation, Jax-RS, JTA and JSF.

You attended JavaOne last year. What was your impression?

This was my first time at JavaOne and also my first time in the US. It was amazing and I hope to get a chance for a second visit in the near future. I attended as much sessions as I could get. It was exhausting but worth it. Hopefully I can introduce some ideas in our daily business.

Can you share any resources (blogs, etc feel free to promote yourself) with us?

I get my newest info from twitter. I read tweets and blogs from Vlad Mihalcea, Thorben Janssen (hellish good JPA specialists), Sebastian Daschner (Java EE evangelist), Payara (Java EE Server) and last but not least Adam Bien. :)

Bastian, thank you for the interview!


Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed
...the last 150 posts
...the last 10 comments